<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: (500) Days, and then what?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.joshdoody.com/2009/12/10/500-days-and-then-what/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.joshdoody.com/2009/12/10/500-days-and-then-what/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:05:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.joshdoody.com/2009/12/10/500-days-and-then-what/comment-page-1/#comment-69</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 18:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshdoody.com/?p=716#comment-69</guid>
		<description>Sean, I think you nailed it. I didn&#039;t want to go into the Sixth Sense angle too intensely in my write-up because I felt that part of the fun of that perspective was allowing each person to run the movie through his own unique filter.  I think, in this case, asking the question, &quot;Does she really even exist?&quot; is a legit one. I think it would be a stretch to prove that she doesn&#039;t exist, but I think there&#039;s an easy case to be made that she doesn&#039;t exist as we see her.  And perhaps there&#039;s a case to be made that Tom&#039;s own fear of commitment and/or failure caused him to view her in a specific way to make it easier on himself when the &quot;inevitable&quot; end of the relationship arrived (quotes used to imply a self-fulfilling prophesy).

I think there could be a few thousand words written on this without too much effort, but I was determined to keep my synopsis in the sub-thousand-word category.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean, I think you nailed it. I didn&#8217;t want to go into the Sixth Sense angle too intensely in my write-up because I felt that part of the fun of that perspective was allowing each person to run the movie through his own unique filter.  I think, in this case, asking the question, &#8220;Does she really even exist?&#8221; is a legit one. I think it would be a stretch to prove that she doesn&#8217;t exist, but I think there&#8217;s an easy case to be made that she doesn&#8217;t exist as we see her.  And perhaps there&#8217;s a case to be made that Tom&#8217;s own fear of commitment and/or failure caused him to view her in a specific way to make it easier on himself when the &#8220;inevitable&#8221; end of the relationship arrived (quotes used to imply a self-fulfilling prophesy).</p>
<p>I think there could be a few thousand words written on this without too much effort, but I was determined to keep my synopsis in the sub-thousand-word category.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean Nyffeler</title>
		<link>http://www.joshdoody.com/2009/12/10/500-days-and-then-what/comment-page-1/#comment-68</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean Nyffeler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:10:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.joshdoody.com/?p=716#comment-68</guid>
		<description>Your Sixth Sense bit has reopened the book on this film for me. Did you notice how, in its own not-so-subtly stylized way, the entire movie kind of felt like a commercial for Zooey Deschanel? There isn&#039;t a single shot where she isn&#039;t framed, lit, dressed, and made up perfectly. She&#039;s presented to the audience as a kind of unattainable object of desire, dangled in front of us for two hours, seemingly with the intent of making us &quot;want&quot; her despite our impregnable distance from her in the exact way that Tom does. So between the way she&#039;s shown to us in a filmic sense and the aura of mystery that surrounds her as a character, Summer is quite literally an apparition. She is as unknowable-yet-haunting as a ghost. We&#039;re not at all incented to like her as a person or sympathize with her dour romantic struggles (the way we are with Tom), only to desire her. I think your reading hinted at this, but when you really look at the bigger picture, it&#039;s not even a story &quot;about&quot; love. It&#039;s all about isolation and the manipulation of desire. No wonder you didn&#039;t walk out happy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your Sixth Sense bit has reopened the book on this film for me. Did you notice how, in its own not-so-subtly stylized way, the entire movie kind of felt like a commercial for Zooey Deschanel? There isn&#8217;t a single shot where she isn&#8217;t framed, lit, dressed, and made up perfectly. She&#8217;s presented to the audience as a kind of unattainable object of desire, dangled in front of us for two hours, seemingly with the intent of making us &#8220;want&#8221; her despite our impregnable distance from her in the exact way that Tom does. So between the way she&#8217;s shown to us in a filmic sense and the aura of mystery that surrounds her as a character, Summer is quite literally an apparition. She is as unknowable-yet-haunting as a ghost. We&#8217;re not at all incented to like her as a person or sympathize with her dour romantic struggles (the way we are with Tom), only to desire her. I think your reading hinted at this, but when you really look at the bigger picture, it&#8217;s not even a story &#8220;about&#8221; love. It&#8217;s all about isolation and the manipulation of desire. No wonder you didn&#8217;t walk out happy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
